Hiking Boots, Trail Runners, and Approach Shoes: Choosing the Right Footwear for Your Adventure

When you’re out on a popular trail in the U.S., you’ll see just about every kind of footwear imaginable. One hiker might be wearing a pair of $300 mountaineering boots built for snow and scree, while the next is jogging by in trail runners. A few steps later, you’ll pass someone in gym sneakers with worn-down soles clearly not designed for the outdoors. That’s the spectrum in American hiking culture—everything from high-end technical gear to casual tennis shoes. This wide range reflects how varied people’s approaches to hiking are in the U.S. Many hikers prioritize comfort over function, and most trails—especially popular ones—are well-maintained Class 1 paths that don’t require specialized footwear. So while technical boots have their place, they’re often overkill for the majority of casual hikes. Compare that to Europe, South America, or parts of Asia, where hiking is often steeper, more rugged, and multi-day by default. There, footwear choices are more utilitarian—designed for function, durability, and terrain demands.

GEARHIKING

Devin

7/21/20253 min read

A Different Footwear Mentality Abroad

In places like Europe, South America, and parts of Asia, hiking (or trekking, as it’s more often called) is approached with a different mindset. Trails can be steeper, more remote, and more technical from the start, and the expectation is that you’ll be out longer and carrying more. Because of this, footwear trends are rooted in practicality and terrain—not comfort marketing.

Take the Alps, for example. European trekkers often wear stiffer, more technical boots or hybrid approach shoes built for mixed terrain. The same goes for the Andes or Nepal’s Himalayas—where trekking routes often involve loose scree, exposure, or long multi-day pushes. There’s less emphasis on lightweight comfort and more on durability, protection, and support.

That contrast—between America's casual day hikes and international multi-day expeditions—is key to understanding why footwear choices differ so much.

Let’s break down the three main categories of hiking footwear and when each makes sense.

Hiking Boots

Best for:

  • Snow-covered trails

  • Backpacking with heavy loads

  • Technical routes with ankle-breaking potential

  • Cold weather where insulation matters

Pros:

  • Ankle support on uneven terrain

  • More durable and long-lasting under heavy use

  • Better protection from water, mud, snow, and rocks

  • Stiffer midsoles for carrying heavier weight

Cons:

  • Heavier, less breathable

  • Take significantly longer to dry when wet

  • Can feel overkill on well-maintained trails

  • Require more break-in time

When I wear them: On snow-covered trails, long treks where I’m carrying a lot of gear, or rugged terrain where I need added stability. They’re also my go-to in cold or wet conditions when dry feet are essential.

Salomon X Ultra 5 MID GORE-TEX Mens

Salomon x Ultra 5 MID GORE-TEX Women

Asolo Fugitive GTX

Trail Running Shoes

Best for:

  • Day hikes

  • Fast and light movement

  • Class 1-2 trails

  • Hot, dry weather

Pros:

  • Extremely lightweight and breathable

  • Dry quickly when wet

  • More comfortable out of the box

  • Great for those who prioritize speed and efficiency

Cons:

  • Less protection from sharp rocks or roots

  • Minimal ankle support

  • Less durable over long-term use or rough terrain

  • Can struggle in snow or deep mud

When I wear them: Most of the time. If I’m doing a quick summit, a scenic loop, or anything that doesn’t involve scrambling or snow, I’m in trail runners. They’re light, fast, and easy on the feet.

My Favorite Trail Runners Scarpa Ribelle Run Mens Women's

Approach Shoes

Best for:

  • Class 3 and 4 terrain

  • Rock scrambles and ridgelines

  • Short technical approaches to climbs

  • Mixed alpine routes

Pros:

  • Sticky rubber soles for excellent grip on rock

  • Tighter fit and better toe precision

  • More durable than trail runners in rough terrain

  • Great hybrid option for hikes with scrambling

Cons:

  • Not ideal for long, flat miles

  • Less cushioning than trail runners

  • Limited water protection

  • Can feel stiff or restrictive on mellow trails

When I wear them: For routes where I know I’ll be doing hands-on rock work—class 3 and 4 scrambles, technical ridgelines, or off-trail alpine routes. They’re my middle ground between trail runners and full mountaineering boots.

Salomon S/Lab ALPINWAY

A Word on Waterproofing

This is where a lot of people get tripped up. While hiking boots offer better waterproof protection—especially with higher cuffs and built-in membranes—once that water level goes over the top, you're stuck with a soggy foot that won’t dry for days.

Trail runners, on the other hand, will get wet faster, but they’ll also dry faster. If you're crossing streams, dealing with rain, or just sweating on a hot day, the ability for your shoes to breathe and recover matters a lot.

The truth: In summer conditions or areas with frequent stream crossings, I’d rather have wet trail runners that dry fast than soggy boots that stay wet for miles. In cold or snowy environments, boots win for insulation and keeping my feet warm even when wet.

Final Thoughts

You don’t need to go extreme when choosing hiking footwear—especially for most U.S. trails. Start by knowing your terrain, your personal comfort needs, and how much weight you’re carrying. For many, a trail runner is more than enough. For others, the stability and protection of a hiking boot or approach shoe is worth the trade-off.

The right footwear is less about the brand and more about the terrain ahead.